§2 — Cosmological Redshift

One photon compared across two formation-coordinate epochs.


Cosmological Redshift Rule

Cosmological redshift is treated as a consequence of already-established EOTU execution rules. It is not assigned to internal photon change, metric stretching, Doppler motion, or an independent postulate.

Redshift emerges from invariant King-cycle timing, discrete photon transport through Dormant Corridors, and epoch-dependent recurrence scaling recorded by Constellus.

\[ 1 + z = \frac{CS_k(\tau_o)} {CS_k(\tau_e)} \]

The relation compares the recurrence scale at observation, \(CS_k(\tau_o)\), to the recurrence scale at emission, \(CS_k(\tau_e)\).

One Photon, Two Epochs

Consider a single photon emitted at formation coordinate \(\tau_e\) and absorbed at formation coordinate \(\tau_o\), with \(\tau_o > \tau_e\). The photon is a discrete \(\Delta\mu\) courier.

  • It occupies one dormant cell per King-cycle boundary.
  • It advances one lattice step per cycle.
  • It carries no phase.
  • It undergoes no internal evolution during transport.

The photon’s internal oscillatory structure is defined in King Time, not in epoch-dependent macroscopic units.

Invariant Quantities

The transport rule depends on quantities that remain invariant across all formation-coordinate snapshots.

Quantity Expression Role
King-cycle duration \(t_k = \mathrm{constant}\) Defines the intrinsic recurrence interval.
Photon step length \(\lambda_k = \mathrm{constant}\) Defines the fixed lattice step per cycle.
Intrinsic photon period \(P_{\mathrm{intrinsic}} = N_{\mathrm{period}}t_k\) Defines the packet period before epoch interpretation.

What Constellus Adds

At the end of each King cycle, Constellus records boundary-state changes. It records transport entries and recurrence-scale context, but it does not change the photon packet.

  • \(\Delta\)-location entries record whether the photon moved.
  • \(\Delta\)-amplitude entries are recorded when an emission or absorption event occurs.
  • The epoch-specific recurrence unit \(CS_k(\tau_k)\) is assigned to the snapshot.

Constellus therefore supplies the cross-epoch comparison context without acting as a force, transport medium, or photon modifier.

Emission Epoch Interpretation

At emission, the photon has an intrinsic period defined by King-cycle counting.

\[ P_{\mathrm{intrinsic}} = N_{\mathrm{period}}t_k \]

Observers at \(\tau_e\) construct clocks using local processes that count King cycles and apply the local recurrence unit.

\[ P_{\mathrm{emit}} = N_{\mathrm{period}}CS_k(\tau_e) \]

This is the local mapping from intrinsic time to macroscopic time at the emission epoch.

Transport Between Epochs

During transport from \(\tau_e\) to \(\tau_o\), the photon advances one dormant-cell hop per King cycle. The number of elapsed King cycles is an integer transport count.

No photon property depends on intermediate values of \(\tau_k\). No cumulative distortion occurs during transport, and no memory of intermediate epochs is stored in the photon packet. Only Constellus snapshots record the evolving recurrence-scale values.

Observation Epoch Interpretation

At absorption, the photon still has the same intrinsic period.

\[ P_{\mathrm{intrinsic}} = N_{\mathrm{period}}t_k \]

Observers at \(\tau_o\) interpret that same intrinsic period using the local recurrence unit of the observation snapshot.

\[ P_{\mathrm{obs}} = N_{\mathrm{period}}CS_k(\tau_o) \]

The observed-to-emitted period comparison is therefore:

\[ \frac{P_{\mathrm{obs}}} {P_{\mathrm{emit}}} = \frac{CS_k(\tau_o)} {CS_k(\tau_e)} \]

This period ratio is the same endpoint recurrence-scale ratio used by the redshift relation.

Section Summary

Cosmological redshift follows from comparing one unchanged transported packet across two formation-coordinate mappings. The photon is emitted under one recurrence scale, transported without internal evolution, and absorbed under another recurrence scale.

The redshift value is therefore not carried as a changing property of the photon. It is evaluated from the Constellus recurrence-scale comparison between \(\tau_e\) and \(\tau_o\).