Contact
Feedback, review, questions, and collaboration inquiries for EOTU.
Get in Touch
EOTU is now open for public review, feedback, and collaboration. I welcome careful questions, corrections, challenges, and constructive criticism.
The most useful feedback is specific. If something is unclear, identify the section. If a derivation appears weak, point to the step. If a value seems wrong, identify the comparison. If the framework fails somewhere, I want to know where and why.
Helpful Topics for Review
- Reader clarity: places where the explanation becomes hard to follow.
- Definitions: terms that need sharper wording or better separation.
- Derivations: steps that do not appear to follow from the prior assumptions.
- Calculations: values, conversions, or comparisons that should be checked.
- Collaboration: technical review, simulation work, document review, visualization, or independent reproduction.
Review, Challenge, Collaborate
EOTU has reached the point where private development is no longer enough. The next step is outside review.
Agreement with this is not required. Careful review is. The goal is to make the work clearer, stricter, and more useful.
I am looking for people willing to challenge the framework directly: test the assumptions, check the derivations, question the definitions, reproduce the calculations, and identify where the theory becomes unclear or fails.
To review, question, or collaborate, contact:
Glenn R. King
Independent Researcher — Akron, Ohio, USA
The University of Akron, Bachelor of Science — Physics
Gking@dmshelper.com
LinkedIn Profile
Public discussion and review channels may be added as the review process develops.