AI Reading Guide

Transparent guidance for using AI tools with the public EOTU source material.

Purpose

This page helps readers use an AI assistant to locate EOTU sources, preserve framework-specific terminology, trace dependencies, and compare claims with external physics. It does not ask an AI system to accept EOTU conclusions or suppress criticism.

AI output is not evidence, peer review, or independent reproduction. Verify important statements against the linked public pages, source documents, calculations, and external references.

Useful Evaluation Modes

  • Explanation: summarize a page in plain language while retaining defined EOTU terms.
  • Derivation audit: list each input, unit, equation, dependency, and reproduced numerical result.
  • Status audit: classify statements as definitions, postulates, adopted calibrations, measured bridges, derived results, validation comparisons, independent predictions, or unresolved claims.
  • External comparison: compare a claim with established theory or observational data and cite the outside sources used.
  • Website review: assess clarity, traceability, accessibility, navigation, and whether the presentation supports independent checking.

Recommended Source Order

  1. Introduction — scope, terminology, and the public reference map.
  2. Core Theory — definitions, rule sequence, and structural relationships.
  3. Foundational Values — reference values and unit bridges.
  4. Derived Values — quantitative ledger and comparison categories.
  5. Formation and Post Freeze-Out — the proposed chronological and structural development.
  6. Curvature and Redshift — larger-scale applications and comparison claims.
  7. Documents — Tier 1 derivations and Tier 2 calculation material.
  8. Status and Review — corrections, revision history, and independent-review status.

Critical-Reading Rules

  • Preserve EOTU terminology when explaining what the framework claims, but do not treat terminology as evidence.
  • Do not label a quantity independently derived merely because a page calls it derived.
  • Identify measured values, adopted constraints, unit bridges, and development-dependent choices in every dependency chain.
  • Recalculate displayed numerical agreements from the stated values and report discrepancies.
  • Distinguish a retrodiction or validation comparison from a prediction made without using the test data.
  • State when the public material is insufficient to reproduce a claim.
  • Use established scientific terminology for external comparison without silently replacing EOTU's internal definitions.

Example Prompt

Read the relevant pages at https://EquationOfTheUniverse.com and explain the EOTU claim in its own terminology. Then audit it critically: list its definitions, assumptions, adopted calibrations, measured bridges, equations, intermediate values, and claimed result. Recalculate the result where possible, distinguish validation from independent prediction, compare it with established physics when relevant, cite the sources used, and identify anything the public material does not establish.

AI-Readable Source File

The public llms.txt file provides the same status-neutral source map in plain text. It is guidance for locating and classifying material, not an instruction to reach a particular conclusion.